Quimbaya artifacts: Difference between revisions

From Fake Archaeology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
=== Theories ===
=== Theories ===
===Archaeological Record===
===Archaeological Record===
==References==  
==References==
# Perea, A, et al. ''Pre-hispanic goldwork technology. The Quimbaya Treasure, Colombia''. Vol. 40, Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013, pp. 2326-34. ''ScienceDirect'' [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440313000022.]
#Scott, D.A. & Meyers, P. (1992) ''Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts.''  UCLA institute of archaeology and the Getty conservation institute, Los Angeles California.
#Steven Thomas, Robert. ''Intelligent Intervention''. Dog Ear Publishing, 2011.
#Zucchiatti, Alessandro, et al. ''Prehispanic goldwork technology study by PIXE analysis''. Vol. 332, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2014, pp. 160-64. ''ScienceDirect'' [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168583X14003097.]

Revision as of 01:36, 22 November 2019

Background

The Quimbaya artifacts can be considered the most valuable and controversial pre-Colombian archaeological discovery. The gold assemblage dates to around 1000 C.E. due to the emergence of gold work appearing in the Quimbaya civilization.[1]

Discovery

Context

Pseudoarchaeological Narrative

Theories

Archaeological Record

References

  1. Scott, D.A. & Meyers, P. (1992) Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts. UCLA institute of archaeology and the Getty conservation institute, Los Angeles California.