Dorchester Pot
Background
The Dorchester Pot measures at around 4.5inches by 6.5inches high, and 2.5 inches in diameter. This bell-shaped object is composed of a metal, which most presume to be zinc with silver overlay, with a small round opening at the top of the bell. The Dorchester Pot is adorned with decorative vines wrapping around the base and six different floral arrangements that decorate the surface of the outer surface of the bell. The decorative elements of the Dorchester Pot undoubtedly seem Victorian style in nature, and according to witnesses, it was clearly made by an extremely experienced blacksmith due to the ornate nature of Dorchester Pot. The utility and or purpose of the Dorchester Pot is unknown, with theories ranging from it being a simply ornamental object, vase, and a hookah base. Since its discovery, further research into the Dorchester Pot has been made impossible as it was lost shortly after its original discovery, leaving only a detailed drawing for reference. Today, the Dorchester Pot is occasionally referred to in articles, and websites where it is classified as an OOPArt (Out of Place Artifact)1, due to the place that it was found, and that it was supposedly not on par with the technology available during the era in which it was found.
Excavation
The Dorchester Pot was discovered in 1852, in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Records indicate that the Dorchester Pot was unearthed by a controlled explosion, that was used to break up a large mass of puddingstone that was under the surface of the ground outside of the Meeting Hill House, belonging to Rev. Nathaniel Hall. According, to witnesses who were present at the time that the explosion was set off, following the blast the Dorchester Pot was discovered in two pieces, amongst the rubble from the puddingstone. While it is unknown exactly who originally discovered the Dorchester Pot, an article by the Boston Transcript, which makes the first-ever mentions to the Dorchester Pot on June 5, 1852, references several notable people from the Dorchester community. Including Rev. Hall, John Kettle, Dr. J.V. C. Smith, John Doyle, and Professor Agassiz.
Context
According to the original article by the Boston Transcript, following its’ discovery, the Dorchester Pot was taken to the home of John Kettle, and an extremely detailed drawing with accurate measurements was made by Dr. J.V. C. Smith who intended to submit it to the popular newspaper Scientific American, so that the Dorchester Pot could be further studied. Shortly, afterward the Dorchester Pot was lost and its location continues to remain unknown, although there have been several people who have since claimed to either own or know the location of the Dorchester is, however, these claims remain unsubstantiated.
Pseudo-Archaelogical Lure
Pseudo-archaeologists have a plethora of theories as to the potential origin of the Dorchester Pot. Several of these theories are based off of the notion that the Dorchester Pot was embedded into puddingstone (this is also frequently referred to as the Roxbury Conglomerate) underneath the surface of the Meeting Hill House,, which when carbon dated proved to be well over 500 million years old. Pseudo-archaeologists theorize that in order for the Dorchester Pot to have been in embedded within the stone this must mean that it too was more than 500 million years old, which would date the Dorchester Pot all the way back to the Ediacaran Period. Obviously, leading to a flurry of theories on how it got there and who created it, by numerous pseudo-archaeologist.
Creationists One of the more common theories regarding the Dorchester Pot is presented by creationists who claim that the Dorchester Pot provides proof of an ancient civilization predating the Noachian Flood. They use the imagery on the surface of the Dorchester Pot, as evidence for this theory. Specifically, the floral depictions, which they claim only existed over 500 years ago when they believe the Dorchester Pot was in fact created. Using this logic they have
Ancient Aliens An alternate theory is that is the Dorchester Pot was evidence of an extremely skilled race of metal worker aliens, that occupied North America sometime around 600 million years ago. This theory stems from the fact that the rock that the Dorchester Pot was said to be encased in, was dated to be around 500 million years old leading them to believe the Dorchester Pot which was found inside of the rock was of the same age. However, obviously, 500 million years ago the technology to work with metal of any kind would not exist. Leading some pseudo-archaeologists to the conclusion that Earth had been visited by extraterrestrials who possessed the technology and resources to work with metal, and either intentionally or accidentally left the Dorchester Pot behind where it would be discovered millions of years later.
Analysis of the Pseudo-Archaeological Narrative
The pseudo-archaeological claims surrounding the Dorchester Pot are A significant portion of the pseudo-archaeological claims are based on the results from carbon dating the rock, however, there is no proof that the Dorchester Pot was actually encased within the solid rock as they describe and there are a number of more reasonable explanations for why the Dorchester Pot could have been found around the rubble caused from the explosion and the Meeting Hill House, and absolutely evidence that the Dorchester Pot was ever encased in stone like the claims say. Within the first article about the Dorchester Pot printed by the Boston Transcript, it mentions Dr. J.V. C. Smith’s recent travels East, without naming any specific region or country. Curiously, though the depictions of the Dorchester Pot bare a striking resemblance to Indian Cigar holders. That is the exact same size and shape, with similar decorations as the Dorchester Pot, and also likely from the same region that one of the few men who were present at the time of the explosion just got back from visiting. Outside the original newspaper article by the Boston Transcript, there is no solid evidence that the Dorchester Pot ever actually existed.
References
- “ Dorchester Pot.” Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias, https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1152348#cite_note-BadArchaeology2007a-9.
- Admin. “1852, May 19: The Dorchester Pot.” Anomalies: the Strange & Unexplained, 21 Jan. 2017, http://anomalyinfo.com/Stories/1852-may-19-dorchester-pot.
- Burby, Tom. “Out of Place Artifact: The Story of the Dorchester Pot.” Strange New England, 21 Sept. 2015, http://www.strangenewengland.com/podcast/out-of-place-artifact-the-story-of-the-dorchester-pot/.
- Crofton, Ian. History without the Boring Bits: a Curious Chronology of the World. Quercus, 2015.
- “Dorchester Vase.” Genesis Park Dorchester Vase Comments, https://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/paleontological/artifacts/dorchester/.
- Fitzpatrick-Matthews, Keith, and Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews. “Metallic Vase from Dorchester, Massachusetts.” Bad Archaeology, 19 Aug. 2007, http://www.badarchaeology.com/out-of-place-artefacts/very-ancient-artefacts/metallic-vase-from-dorchester-massachusetts/.
- Nali. “On the Menu.” OOPArt? The Dorchester Pot - [Le Site D'Irna], https://irna.fr/OOPArt-The-Dorchester-Pot.html.
- Robinson, J.P. “OOPArts Found in Coal and Stone: Is There an Explanation for These Anomalous Bells, Chains, Walls and More?” Ancient Origins, Ancient Origins, https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/ooparts-found-coal-0010767.
- The Book of the Damned: By Charles Fort, https://archive.org/stream/bookdamnedbycha00fortgoog#page/n130/mode/2up.
- “The Dorchester Pot: New Questions about an Old OOPART.” Jason Colavito, http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/the-dorchester-pot-new-questions-about-an-old-oopart.
- “The Mysterious Dorchester Pot Found Solidly Embedded within 15 Feet of Sedimentary Rock: Out-of-Place Artifacts (OOPArt).” Of, http://thebiggestsecretsoftheworld.blogspot.com/2011/02/mysterious-dorchester-pot-oopart.html.
- “The Mystery of the 500-Million-Year Old Dorchester Pot.” TRANSCEND Media Service, https://www.transcend.org/tms/2015/08/the-mystery-of-the-500-million-year-old-dorchester-pot/.