Gosford Glyphs

From Fake Archaeology
Revision as of 20:43, 9 November 2021 by AnneJansen (talk | contribs) (Added a bit of the deconstruction from ABC News source)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is the site/artifact?

What is the context in which it was found/excavated/etc?

What is the pseudoarchaeological narrative associated with the site/artifact?

With multiple sources of evidence, critically deconstruct the pseudoarchaeological narrative

Many Egyptologists have come to the consensus that the glyphs are fake because of inaccuracies/discrepancies in the glyphs. These Egyptologists include: Associate Professor Boyo Ockinga from Macquarie University's Ancient History Department; ... . Inaccuracies are evident in the way that the glyphs were carved into the rocks, as well as in what time period the glyphs used came from. Some glyphs came from thousands of years after the glyph was supposedly carved.[1]


Resources

  1. ABC News. (2012, December 14). Egyptologist debunks new claims about “Gosford glyphs.” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-14/glyphs-reax/4428134